Conversational blogging

Thursday, March 26th, 2009

Charlie has written about how he sometimes finds himself writing very long comments, which he then knows he wants to turn into a blog post instead.

I can totally relate to this, I have often found some of my best thoughts come out as comments, rather than blog posts.  The reason for me is quite simple.  The idea of publishing a post about something means that I get all hung up about having to say something coherently, or at least with some real thought as to what I’m wanting to say.  It’s only when I really allow myself to just write out what comes to mind that I’m able to sometimes get a post written (like right now).

I don’t write, edit, re-write, hone, refine and then post.  I write and hit publish.

Some conversations just don’t allow for rambling thoughts.  Or rather, rambling thoughts aren’t going to add to the conversation.  They deserve serious reflection, such as Jonathan‘s post about how we define our relationship to  ‘work’.  I feel so strongly about this, and am still playing with this idea, that I feel unable to write anything sensible about it that won’t be full of blatant pot holes and fill me with shame within 5 minutes of hitting publish.

Hence I haven’t written anything more than a strongly worded comment in response to one very angry commenter.

Yes, it’s my stuff that stops me.  And yes, I don’t need to write massive complex posts that solve the issue once and for all (cause no-one’s able to do that in some cases) but I *want* to.  And that stops me from posting more about that sort of thing.

It suddenly appears as a huge time sink, a massive committment to a monumental undertaking. Blogging is not about massive commitments for me.  It’s about writing out my ideas and sharing them because I think they might be useful, interesting or a way to connect to like minded people.  To have an in-depth conversation for me I want to be face to face.  Able to tweak my meaning with real-time responses, give nuance with my body and tone, and read the understanding rising in the other person as I try and explain my idea.  Seeing it morph and grow in response to their reactions.

I struggle to have that kind of a relationship with blogging.  It is too slow, too detached for me.  It feels very one-way.

But then maybe what Charlie’s talking about will help to resolve that.

Want to see more? Try one of these posts:

2 comments

 1 

I think what I’m talking about will help, but, as you mention, some of it is getting over the hang up that what we have to write needs to be perfect. If you can write a reasonably coherent response, as you did to Sonia’s post, in thirty minutes, that can easily be a post for the day.

You’re then free to do other things without feeling like you need to post or any commitments like that; and you’ve kept a conversation going, to boot.

Blogging conversations don’t replace real conversations, but they’re great for getting out complex ideas that deserve more attention that the stuff that’s sitting on the top of our heads. And the big ideas are the ones that are really worth getting out of our heads.

Blogging is so not one-way – or at least, it doesn’t have to be. They’re not one way even in the cases where we think they’re one way, given how we get our ideas.

Just some ideas that come to mind…

Charlie’s last blog post..Bringing Conversations (Back?) to Blogging

March 26th, 2009 at 12:54 pm
 2 

Agreed. :)

March 27th, 2009 at 5:40 am

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment