If it’s not worth responding to, is it worth reading?

Wednesday, April 1st, 2009

I asked this question on twitter, and mostly the response was that there’s more to the value of blog posts than simply the visible response that they create.  The conversation may continue in people’s minds, offline lives, or simply as neural connections waiting for the final link to be made to spark a great idea.

The reason this thought came up was that I realise I spending a lot of time reading very interesting information on the web, but I’m not convinced that a lot of it is useful to me.  So I wondered if I could create a quick little rule to help me suss out whether it was worth reading a blog post – i.e. is this a topic that I would want to respond to?

The conversation on twitter makes me think that’s not particularly useful, plus the fact that to know whether I want to respond I’d probably have to read it in the first place, but the point remains that I seem to be spectacularly avoiding doing stuff that I think will help (as anyone who is subscribed to my Shiva Nata blog may have noticed *tumbleweed*).

The real answer? I’m thinking it’ll be mindfulness.  Paying attention to where I spend my time – blech!

Still, in terms of lessons to learn when you’ve no time constraints, being able to manage your own time to get what you want done without having a big bad boss to scare you into it is probably a good way to go.  And if the whole ‘go towards your fears’ thing is such a good indicator (and it is, no matter how much we want to deny it) then the blech is probably a good indicator (since this time it came from a place of shuddering and cringing).

Ho hum, best head over to Productive Flourishing then and grab some of Charlie’s awesome free goodies!

Want to see more? Try one of these posts:

4 comments

 1 

Don’t we all spectacularly avoid stuff that we think will help?

JoVE’s last blog post..What is a doctoral candidate to do?

April 1st, 2009 at 2:28 am
 2 

Interesting! Since December, when I really started writing my own blog properly again, I’ve had very commenters compared to some blogs.

Having spent a long time writing online, I know that some people find me intimidating, other people don’t know what to say, and anyway, I write each post for me to process. You’re being invited into my head and my heart, rather than me starting a conversation.

On top of that, I very often read things to which I don’t respond. I’m glad I read it, but I might not have anything to say about it. Very often things require more than a response offered in just a moment of time.

That’s my take.

Joely Black’s last blog post..Where it begins: The ancient world of Amnar

April 1st, 2009 at 9:00 am
 3 

@JoVE Ha ha! Of course, if we didn’t, we wouldn’t have the problem in the first place!

@Joely – Comments and trackbacks (posts in reply to their posts, my original motivation for this thought) are definitely not the sole marker for a posts value, and again I can not know what others get out of my posts, but my thoughts here were more that I fear I spend too much time reading blogs that I find interesting. I’m not about to say no to reading a varied group of blogs, but I wonder if there is a point of diminishing returns (almost certainly) and whether I have passed it (I suspect so).

April 3rd, 2009 at 3:16 am
pat:
 4 

De-lurking to comment. I come from a generation that grew up without interactive media–so for me, the default mode is to read, take it in, and process it myself *without* publishing a response! I’ve had to train myself to post a comment once in a while. By the way, found your blog by googling around for Shiva Nata and following some links.

May 29th, 2010 at 4:18 pm

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment